More Updates . . .

Word Press is now up to 5.0.3 and a whole bunch of other updates for themes and plugins have arrived as well. All installed successfully.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Look into 2019 . . .

This is a verbatim quote from Professor Chris Grey’s blog at and for details about him and who is is, you should go to the blog and read his “About Me” entry . . .

“What happens in the next three months, perhaps even the next couple of weeks, is going to shape the fate of the country for decades. If Brexit goes ahead, in any form, it will enact a profound misreading of the nature of the contemporary political and economic world and represent an unprecedented failure of British statecraft. Before the next round of political theatre begins, it’s worth standing back to consider just why that is so.

It has become commonplace to see Brexit as a backlash against globalization and/or to bemoan it for failing to accept globalization. In fact, it would be better to see it as a failure to understand the regionalization of economics and the multi-polar nature of international relations.

Brexit as a failure of economic strategy

Economic regionalization is most obvious in relation to trade, although trade is only one of its manifestations. On the one hand, and there is nothing new about this, countries tend to trade more with their closest neighbours than with those that are more distant (the so-called ‘gravity model’ of trade). Dominic Raab recently tweeted a strange comment to the effect that the difference between remainers and leavers is that the former believe UK prosperity to be dependent on its location, whereas the latter believe that it is dependent on our character. It’s an absurd notion. There are obvious cost and logistic reasons for location to matter in terms of goods trade, but it also applies to trade in services. National ‘character’, whatever that may mean, doesn’t enter into it.

On the other hand, and which is newer, that basic reality has been institutionalised via the creation of regional trade blocs of various sorts – MERCOSUR, AEC, CPTTP, NAFTA and so on. The European single market is not only one example of this, but is an example of a particular sort. Being a single market rather than simply a free trade bloc or area entails a far more extensive deepening of economic integration.

Amongst other things, this accounts for the fact that there is far greater services trade liberalisation in the single market than in any of the other regional blocs. It also accounts for the highly integrated supply chains running across national borders, and for the fairly integrated labour market by virtue of freedom of movement.

These facts, taken together, mean that alongside the general propensity of trade to be geographically skewed to close neighbours, UK services and also its most advanced manufacturing industries are very deeply embedded in the European market. It is not necessary to make or accept economic forecasts, only to understand basic institutional realities, to see that detaching a country from its regional bloc and then seeking to re-attach it on unknown, but by definition worse, terms to that same bloc, in an unknown time frame, is going to have adverse consequences for businesses and trade, and hence for employment and tax revenues.

The limitations of globalization and the naivety of Brexiters

However, the deeper issue about regionalization is that although it is not the reason for the foundation of the EU it has emerged as one of its key functions because of the failures and limitations of globalization. This is most obvious in the way that the WTO has made relatively little progress in providing a comprehensive architecture for global trade in, especially, services and agriculture. The stasis that has been evident since the ‘Doha round’ can only be exacerbated by Trump’s anti-WTO positions. In this way, regionalization makes a mockery of both the globalist and the nationalist cases for Brexit.

The naivety of globalist Brexiters

The naivety of the globalists is evident in their repeated call for Britain to trade on WTO terms as if these provided anything other than the most basic and limited participation in global trade. By exiting not only the regional single market but also the EU as a gateway to preferential trade deals around the world, the Global Britain agenda is, as a Foreign Affairs Select Committee report put it, a meaningless one. Indeed, its irony is very obvious in Liam Fox’s recent delighted announcement of the value to Britain of the new EU-Japan trade deal – a deal which Britain is due to fall out of once Brexit is completed.

The naivety of nationalist Brexiters

No less naïve are nationalist Brexiters of various hues, both right and left wing. For they fail to recognize that whilst the WTO doesn’t provide a comprehensive and deeply-developed trade system of the sort found in the single market, nor does it allow the pure ‘sovereignty’ of national self-determination. Thus it makes no sense at all for right-wing nationalist proponents of such sovereignty to be so enthusiastic about being bound by WTO rules over which Britain will have far less say than, as a member, it has over EU rules.

Equally, ‘Lexiters’ who imagine that Brexit will bring, or is required to allow, freedom from state aid rules are entirely wrong, as competition law expert George Peretz QC explained in a recent article. More generally, the Lexiter vision of ‘socialism in one country’, which seems to inform Corbyn’s approach to Brexit, is rooted in pre-regionalization economic thinking: national economies are no longer discrete, bounded entities and could only be made so by mass immiseration.

In short, different kinds of Brexiter share a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the contemporary economic world. The globalists don’t understand that globalization has taken the form of a series of regionalizations. There’s no realistic way of being global without also being regional. The nationalists don’t understand that nationalism has been embedded within regionalism. There’s no realistic way of being national without also being regional.

It’s no good Brexiters saying ‘but Britain managed perfectly well before’: even if that were true, which is highly questionable, Brexit isn’t a time machine. The world that existed in 1973 has disappeared. In this sense, Brexit represents a profound strategic error for the British economy: if the most basic feature of a national (like an organizational) strategy is its fit with the realities of its environment then Brexit is certain to have a poor outcome because it is incompatible with the realities of regionalization.

Brexit as a failure of geo-political strategy

But the strategic error goes well beyond trade and economics. It is also based on a complete misunderstanding of contemporary geo-politics and international relations. In the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union there was a brief period when the idea of the ‘end of history’ gained ground. Western capitalism and liberal democracy had ‘won’ and were now the only game in town. That analysis was bound up with the idea of economic globalization, but it also implied a uni-polar geo-politics and a trend to ideological homogeneity. In Britain, that analysis was most obvious in the politics of New Labour.

Thirty years on from the fall of the Berlin Wall, and we can see how, again, naïve that analysis looks in almost every respect. The world is not uni-polar, nor is it any longer bi-polar in the way it arguably was during the Cold War, but multi-polar. One aspect of that, in part because of the impact of end of history type-thinking on reshaping the post-Soviet space, is that Russian nationalism is resurgent, of which more shortly. The rise of Chinese global capitalism – China joined the WTO in 2001 – has not been accompanied by liberal democracy and in many respects, most obviously state involvement in private enterprises, is completely different to the neo-liberal model of capitalism that had supposedly triumphed.

At all events, there are now three military superpowers (the US, China and Russia) and three economic superpowers (the US, China and the EU). And of course there is also a string of regional power brokers – India and Iran being examples, albeit of very different sorts.

This would always have been a complex and unstable world within which Britain had to operate, made far more so by a US administration so radically different to those we have been used to. Adding to that by fundamentally shifting geo-political positioning – not for strategic reasons or with any planned or desired end-state in mind, but simply by the series of political accidents and miscalculations that led to the Brexit vote – is folly of the highest order.

Russia and Brexit

That is true both in a general sense but in at least two more specific ways. First because it entails repositioning Britain within an international order which almost universally sees Brexit as incomprehensible, if not downright crazy. And second because about the only international player who gains from Brexit is Russia, a country currently routinely hostile to the rules-based international order in general, and to Britain in particular.

Indeed, it is extraordinary that Brexiters should see ECJ rulings as a threat to British sovereignty when there are regular aggressive Russian incursions into British airspace and waters and when the Russian state “almost certainly” made a chemicals weapon attack on British soil in Salisbury.

It is not necessary to believe that Russia directly or decisively interfered in the 2016 referendum – although there is evidence for this – to see how destabilising both Britain and the EU is firmly in the interests of Putin’s Russia. And the flip side of that is the way that – as the Salisbury attack showed – Britain relies on the EU as one part of its diplomatic defences in relation to Russia in that case, but also more generally.

At all events, Putin’s recent statements about Brexit are abundantly clear. The 2016 Referendum, he opined, expressed the will of the people and a further vote would be a betrayal. That is, ironically, precisely the line that Theresa May is taking. It is obviously also a gloating taunt, mocking Britain, and more especially Brexiters could they but see it.

Brexit is a huge victory for Putin. It damages Britain, it damages the EU, and it presents possibilities for Russia in the Baltic and Balkan states. If Brexit is a strategic disaster for Britain, it’s a triumph for Russia.

The abandonment of strategy

As with economic regionalization, the lesson of multi-polar geo-politics is that few countries, and certainly not Britain, can operate outside of power blocs. It doesn’t matter if a country is the fifth (or sixth, or seventh) biggest economy in the world, or one with, relative to many countries, considerable military, security, and soft power assets. Outside of the big three or four economic and/or political blocs is a chilly place to put yourself by choice rather than necessity.

Current attempts to retro-fit a geo-political strategy to Brexit, notably Jeremy Hunt’s notion of an Asian pivot, underscore this. Not only is it incoherent in its own terms, not least for being predicated in part on Britain having a close relationship with the EU, it also contains nothing that could not be done, and done more effectively, whilst remaining an EU member. The exception to that might be the idea of adopting the ‘Singapore model’, but not only has this been debunked by the PM of Singapore as a non-starter it is also completely incompatible with maintaining a close relationship with the EU (for whom it would be an evident act of economic hostility) and, needless to say, is nothing remotely like what leave voters were promised.

The reality is that Brexit was never conceived of as a strategic project, still less a strategically desirable one. It was always a protest campaign not a plan. Now, it has really come down to just two justifications: to end freedom of movement and to honour the result of the referendum. Without even discussing, yet again, whether or not these are good political justifications for Brexit, the point to make is that whatever else they are, they are not a strategic basis for Brexit.

So if Brexit goes ahead it will mark not just a failure of economic and geo-political strategy – and, after all, such failures are common enough – but something much more unusual: the abandonment of any serious attempt to have such strategy. The difference between May’s deal and no deal in this respect is only one of how quickly and how dramatically the effects of that are felt. If MPs vote against May’s deal, then that will be the first step away from the brink – not enough in itself, but a necessary pre-condition for avoiding disaster, as well, of course, as risking the even greater one of no deal.

However, if it were then to come about that – by virtue of a referendum or some other route – Brexit is abandoned it will be vital to understand and make a case for that not on the basis of returning to 2016 but as a long-term strategic decision about Britain’s future, mediated by its regional position and recognizing the fraught complexities of a multi-polar world.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Look into 2019 . . .

Reminders of things past . . .

Today dawned bright, clear, and very cold. Roofs and fields were white with frost and many remained so all day. We decided that since Galloway Lodge in Gatehouse of Fleet announced via Facebook that it was open today – the 2nd of January is a Bank Holiday in Scotland – we would give it a try. We found that it was pretty full but were able to get one of the remaining tables without difficulty. Despite the crowds the staff coped remarkably well and we were soon served an enjoyable lunch. By the time we were drawing our lunch break to a close it was evident that people were queueing to get in.

I have not seen this, except at motorway service stations, for many years and it took me back to the war years and immediately post war, when queues to get in a a cafe were quite common – and when you got in and asked for beans on toast (which was about the hopeful norm in those days) the answer would quite likely be, “Sorry, beans is orf luv”, so you would work through the whole gamut of possibilities until you found something that was “on” and thought yourselves grateful to get it.

We came home via the Carrick coast. Families and individuals were out enjoying the beaches although the weather was going a bit grey by early afternoon, one had a camp fire going, and in the distance the Isle of Man was half hidden by a veil of cloud.

Posted in Dumfries and Galloway, Eating Out, Gatehouse of Fleet, Scotland, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Reminders of things past . . .

A Tale of a Hub . . .

BT Smart Hub

A few days before Christmas BT notified me via their Home Page that there was a new contract available to which I could subscribe if I so desired. Having peered at the small print of this for some time I could see no snags so decided to go for it. The deal included a new smart hub (the name BT gives to its router) and a repeater thingy to improve WiFi reception in remoter parts of the house. I duly signed up and was told that the kit would be delivered on the 27th December (which I thought was a bit optimistic being so near Christmas) and that it would go through the letter box and did not need to be signed for so it would not matter if we were out. And to top it off, the progress of the delivery could be tracked.

Well, (you guessed didn’t you ?) we waited in all day on the 27th and no parcel(s) arrived. Using the tracking facility BT themselves now said that there would be two parcels one of which would go through the letter box, and the other of which would need to be signed for. But when we clicked through to track the progress of the parcel one got taken to the Royal mail facility which worked OK, but could tell us no more than that the parcel(s) had reached a Royal mail depot on Tyneside on Christmas Eve.

On the morning of the 28th or cheery Postie arrived with two stout cardboard boxes wrapped in a vacuum packed jacket which definitely would never have got through the letter box. I told him that I thought one of the boxes ought to be signed for, which caused a certain amount of agitation, but he could see nothing on the labelling to indicate this, nor on his handy dandy electronic gadget. So I bade him not to worry, and off he went.

Having got the boxes out of the vacuum packing (no mean feat in itself) I wired up the new router, but all to no avail. Like Scrooge’s old partner, Marley, it was dead as a doornail. So I reverted to the old kit and began some systematic testing on the new to see if I could find out what might be wrong. To cut a long story short, the three pin power pack plug supplied is one of those universal things which comes without pins and the customer slides in a pin set appropriate to the country’s system. It was this that was not working, and I guess that when the three pin bit is pushed in, the electrical contact tabs don’t meet up correctly. So going back to the new router, and using the old power pack, it fired up immediately and was soon working.

But, given the emphasis there is these days (quite correctly too) on security, I was just a bit surprised to find that my laptop was working fine whilst telling me that I was connected via the now disconnected old router and without requesting any new password for the new one ! Quite how this could be when the old router was in the box ready to be returned for re-cycling I do not know. Eventually the WiFi connection wizard found the new router by name, I was able to click on it and insert the new password and all was a bit more conventional.

Quite what would have happened to a customer without much idea of how to check for faults or connect up WiFi (the instructions made it seem all so easy) I don’t know.

Posted in Christmas, Comment, Computers, Technical Stuff | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Tale of a Hub . . .

Looking back at 2018 . . .

January 2018

In January we paid a visit to Port William, and called in at the Isle of Whithorn on the way home. We caught the community tea room shortly before it closed for the day but had a cuppa while the ladies cleared up.

The “Mariner” at Kippford.

A visit to the Mariner Hotel at Kippford where they do very good fish and chips – mackerel if you are lucky.

Kirkcudbright – the Harbour Cottage Gallery.

The Harbour Cottage Gallery exhibition in March.

Some blog changes.

April must have been quiet on the photography front. But I seem to have been re-jigging my blogging !

Minniwick pots.

May was the month of the open studios. One such was Andy Priestman’s pottery at Minniwick near Glen Trool village. We were very taken with the pots and Andy took a lot of our money !

Funeral flowers

June turned out to be a sad month in that our daughter in law lost her grandfather.

Sorting out.

In July we were sorting out stuff that had been dumped as we moved in house in the previous year. No point in rushing things !

Lacecap hydrangea

By July summer had arrived and we had to do a lot of watering in order to keep things alive.

Plant Fair.

Kirkcudbright Autumn Plant Fair in mid September. Summer has departed and it is a grey day and cool.

The Festival of Light was in October. The weather did not help, but plenty of people turned out to see the effects.

November, the month of remembrance – a hundred years after the armistice of 1918, the “war to end all wars”, but we managed to have another one just over twenty years later.

In December we had a fleeting visit from our American family, here seen packing their bags on the morning of their departure via Glasgow to Iceland to see Santa Claus (not).

Posted in Dumfries and Galloway, Reminiscences, Scotland | Tagged | Comments Off on Looking back at 2018 . . .

Christmas Eve 2018

Christmas Eve 2018 dawned with a hard frost, bright sunshine and blue skies. The sun of course rose in the south east, and set in the south west and was in our eyes for much of the time. We attempted some photos, with varying degrees of success, but it was a fun day out, and all the better for being unexpected.

  1. Kirkcudbright – the marina.
  2. Kirkcudbright – the Dhoon.
  3. Brighouse Bay.
  4. Brighouse Bay.
  5. Silly old man paddling.
  6. Brighouse Bay – sedimentary rock tilted to near vertical.
  7. Kirkcudbright Bay – near Mutehill.
  8. Kirkcudbright Bay – near Mutehill.
  9. Kirkcudbright Bay – near Mutehill, and time to go home.

Posted in Christmas, Dumfries and Galloway, Kirkcudbright, Local News, Scotland | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Christmas Eve 2018

Sunshine ! . . . and Frost

A lovely sunny, bright morning with blue skies early on. High pressure in command it seems. A hard white frost overnight with one or two plants looking a bit sad. So good is it that we might even venture out to take advantage of it and convert a little of the sunlight into vitamin D.

Posted in Christmas, Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland | Tagged , | Comments Off on Sunshine ! . . . and Frost

“Thank you for your card . . .”

This year’s Christmas Cards.

As the years go by the Christmas Card list slowly evolves, or it might be more accurate to write that it slowly “dissolves”. We ourselves are in our mid eighties so all this is entirely understandable.

Each year the writing in the cards wishing you “all the best for the new year” gets shakier, and harder to read, and (as this year) sometimes the sender writes the message but forgets to say who they are. The Royal Mail franking is not as meaningful as once it was so trying to guess the sender is not always a productive pastime. Each year the sad news comes that a husband or wife has died, or has suffered a stroke, or has had to have a serious operation, Often a downsize of house has been necessary and so a new address is given.

So, this year I have taken a photograph of the cards we have received so far, that is up to Saturday, 22nd December, and we are pleasantly surprised (and pleased) to say that we have had to put up a second piece of string ! There will be many who read this who will say, “Rhubarb ! get some cards you losers!”, and alas there will be others who will think how lucky we are to get that many, or indeed any cards at all.

It seems fitting therefore to end this blog entry by saying we hope you have a happy, holy, and blessed Christmas and that the awful looking 2019 looming ahead of us will at least be survivable in some fashion and that we are here next Christmas to exchange greetings once again.

Posted in Christmas, Holidays, Reminiscences | Tagged , | Comments Off on “Thank you for your card . . .”

More WordPress news . . .

More improvements on the way we are told . . .

I just installed the Yoast plugin, so now this site will be toast.

Yesterday evening Microsoft announced that they were kindly about to send me their 1809 update. Hoping that this meant they now thought it was fit for purpose after their troubles hitherto, I let it all happen. Took a loooong time and delayed the going to bed process, but it finally finished, AND – this laptop is still working – not trashed as has happened before.

Posted in Technical Stuff, | Comments Off on More WordPress news . . .

Over the Cliff with the mighty Amazon . . .

Today I ordered something from Amazon. Pretty bad eh ? I made the mistake of doing the ordering on a tablet where old fingers don’t seem to work as well as young ones, and where one tap can cover about three possibilities. I knew that come what may I must not fall into the trap set by the Amazon natives of ending up with an unwanted membership of Prime. The order was placed, and congratulating myself on my astuteness (you don’t fool Oldies as easily as all that Mr Amazon I said to myself !) I carried on with my day.

Imagine therefore my chagrin, dismay, discombobulation, and, yes, anger when later on I received emails from Amazon announcing that my order was confirmed, and welcoming me as a new “Prime” member.  They helpfully included a link to a form which I could print off and send by post to Luxembourg renouncing my new found status. But also, in near impossible to read hieroglyphics it said I could cancel my provisional membership by tinkering about on line – which I promptly did. It took a bit of digging around to find the right place – they don’t intend to make it easy – but eventually came success. All the way, and in a later email I was asked whether I really meant to cancel, and listing all the fantastic privileges I was passing up.  No mention of course of the privilege that Amazon was about to receive in the form of an annual subscription from me.

And just in case you are the least bit interested we are now up to WordPress 5 with the new Gutenberg editor built in. And I quite like it !

Posted in Comment, Computers, Technical Stuff, | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Over the Cliff with the mighty Amazon . . .